Translation of compound nouns in the film: Comparison of the dubbing and subtitle by Christensen’s theory
Abstract
Translation can be defined as encoding the meaning and form in the target language by means of the decoded meaning and the form of the source language. Audiovisual translation (AVT) is a new field in translation studies. There are two typical forms for AVT: spoken and written. The spoken methods retain the language in oral form. Dubbing is a process during which the original soundtrack is replaced by a new soundtrack, recorded by actors in the target language. The written type of AVT is subtitling. In this case, the spoken dialogue is converted into written form and the text is usually placed at the bottom of the screen. This study works on the translation of compound nouns in the serial movie named” The walking dead”, it is an American horror drama television series developed by Frank Darabont ,based on the comic book series of the same name by Robert Kirkman, Tony Moore and Charlie Adlard. It compares the translation of compound nouns in dubbing and subtitle of this serial movie by Christensen‘s theory.Compounds are known to be formed by at least two words that here the combination of two nouns is considered. To obtain the foresaid goal, 5 hours of the film were analyzed based on Christensen’s (2014) framework.Christensen defined ten strategies for translating compounds. Straightforward translation, decomounding, change of meaning and rewording were used by the translators and all of these four strategies were in common between the dubbed and subtitled versions of translation.
Keywords:
Translation, Audiovisual Translation, Subtitling, Translation Strategies, Compound Noun
فهرست مطالب
1.2. Statement of the Problem.. 4
1.3. Significance of the study. 5
1.4. Objectives of the Study. 5
1.7.2. Translation And Transfer 7
1.7.3. Straightforward Translation. 8
1.7.5. Explicit Translation. 9
1.8. Definition of Key Terms. 11
1.8.2. Audiovisual Translation. 11
1.8.4. Translation Strategies. 12
CHAPTER TWO: REVIEW OF LITERATURE. 14
CHAPTER THREE: METHODOLOGY.. 25
3.4. Data Collection Procedure. 27
3.5. Data Analysis Procedure. 27
CHAPTER FOUR: RESULTS AND DISCUSSION.. 28
4.2.1.Straightforward Translation. 29
5.2. Response to the First Research Question. 38
5.3. Response to the Second research Question. 38
5.4. Response to the Third research Question. 39
5.6.Percantage of Strategies Applied By The Translators In Dubbing And Subtitling 40
5.7. Pedagogical Implications. 41
5.8. Suggestions for Further Studies. 41
List of Tables
Table 1-1: Strategies For Translating Compounds. 6
Table 4-1: The Frequency And Percentage Of The Strategies For Translation. 36
List of Figures
منابع
- Bell, Roger T. 1991. Translation and Translating. UK: Longman Group
- Benjamin, A. (1989) Translation and the Nature of Philosophy, London and New York: Routledge.
- Booij, G. (2005). The grammar of word. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Chomsky, N. (1971).’Selected reading’. In Allen, J .P .B .V, van Buren, Poovp.
- Christensen , L.S. W (2014).Translating compound nouns in user manuals: A study of strategies employed in rendering of technical language. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. University of Aarhus University.
- Dastjerdi, H., & Rahekhoda, R. (2010).Expansion in subtitling: The case of three English films with Persian subtitles. Journal of Language and Translation, 11(1), 7-27.
- Diaz Cintas, J. (2003). Audiovisual translation in the third millennium. In G. Anderman & M. Rogers (Eds.), Translation today: Trends and perspectives (pp. 192-204). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
- Diaz Cintas, J. (2010). AVT: The importance of audiovisual translation for Europe. Retrieved from http:// www.portal 7.ch/interviews/interviews/Jorge.html
- Dynamics of Instructional Groups: Sociopsychological Aspects of Teaching and Learning, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 136–63.
- Fakhrossadat, B. (2006). On the most common strategies used in subtitling cartoons. Retrieved from http://www.translationindustry.ir/uploads/pdf
- Fisher, W., Avery, P., Hambly, G., & Melville, C. (Eds.). (1991).The Cambridge history of Iran (7th ed.). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
- Gottlieb, H. (1992). Subtitling: A new university discipline. In G. Dollerup & A. Lindergaard (Eds.), Teaching translation and interpreting (pp. 161-170). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
- Jackson, J. (1960) “Structural Characteristics of Norms,” in N.B.Henry (ed.) The
- Krings, H. P. (1986). Translation problems and translation strategies of advanced German learners of French. In J. House & S. Blum- Kulka (Eds.), Interlingual and intercultural communication (pp. 263-275). Tuebingen: Gunter Narr.
- Larson, M (1984) Meaning-based translation: A guide to cross-language Equivalence, Lanham, New York & London: University Press of America.
- Lomheim, S. (1995). Translation theory: An elementary introduction. Oslo: Universietsforlaget.
- Luyken, G., Herbst, T., Langham, J., Reid, H., & Spinhof, H. (1991). Overcoming language barriers in television: Dubbing and subtitling for the European audience. Dusseldorf: The European Institute for the Media.
- Marashi, H., & Poursoltani, Kh. (2009). An analysis of Farsi into English subtitling strategies employed in Iranian Feature films. Journal of Teaching English as a Foreign Language and Literature, 1(1), 15-29.
- Newmark, P. (1986). Approaches to Translation. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
- Newmark, p.(1988) . A Text book of Translation . New York and London: Prentice –Hall.
- Nida, E, A .Taber, C .R. (1969).The Theory and practice of translation. Leiden: J .Brill.
- O’ Connell, E. (2007). Screen translation. In P. Kuhiwczak & K. Littau (Eds.), A companion to translation studies (pp. 120-133). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
- Perego, E. (2003). Evidence of explicitation in subtitling: Towards a categorization. Across Languages and Cultures, 4(1), 63-88.
- Pettit, Z. (2009). Connecting cultures: Cultural transfer in subtitling and dubbing. In J. Diaz Cintas (Ed.), New trends in audiovisual translation (pp. 44-57). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
- Schjoldager, Anne. (2008). Understanding translation. Academica, Aarhus.
- Spencer, A. (1991).Morphological theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
- Toury, G.(1995).Descriptive translation Studies and beyond. Amsterdaim:Benjamin.
- Veiga, M. J. (2009). The translation of audiovisual humour in just a few words. In J. Diaz Cintas (Ed.), New trends in audiovisual translation (pp. 158-175). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
- Venuti, L. (1995).The translator’s invisibility: A history of translation. London and New York: Routledge.
- Weller,M (2014).Distinguishing degrees of compositionality in compound splitting for statistical machine translation. Dublin and Ireland.
- Yamaha,K.,Masuyama,S.,Ohtake,K.&Shahzad,I. (2000).Identifying translations of compound nouns using non-alignedcorpora. Toyohashi: Toyohashi University of technology press.
- farsisubtitle.ir
- subsense.com