جستجو برای:
  • صفحه اصلی
  • علوم انسانی
    • مدیریت
      • پایان نامه مدیریت اجرایی
      • پایان نامه مدیریت بازرگانی
      • پایان نامه مدیریت جهانگردی
      • پایان نامه مدیریت دولتی
    • اقتصاد
    • تربیت بدنی
    • حسابداری
    • حقوق
    • روانشناسی و مشاوره
    • زبان و ادبیات انگلیسی
    • زبان و ادبیات فارسی
    • علوم اجتماعی
    • علوم تربیتی
  • فنی و مهندسی
    • برق
    • صنایع
    • عمران
    • کامپیوتر
  • هنر
    • پژوهش هنر
    • شهرسازی
    • معماری
  • علوم پایه
    • پرستاری
  • گزارش کارآموزی
  • صفحه اصلی
  • علوم انسانی
    • مدیریت
      • پایان نامه مدیریت اجرایی
      • پایان نامه مدیریت بازرگانی
      • پایان نامه مدیریت جهانگردی
      • پایان نامه مدیریت دولتی
    • اقتصاد
    • تربیت بدنی
    • حسابداری
    • حقوق
    • روانشناسی و مشاوره
    • زبان و ادبیات انگلیسی
    • زبان و ادبیات فارسی
    • علوم اجتماعی
    • علوم تربیتی
  • فنی و مهندسی
    • برق
    • صنایع
    • عمران
    • کامپیوتر
  • هنر
    • پژوهش هنر
    • شهرسازی
    • معماری
  • علوم پایه
    • پرستاری
  • گزارش کارآموزی

ورود

رمز عبور را فراموش کرده اید؟

هنوز عضو نشده اید؟ عضویت در سایت
  • خانه
  • مجله پارسی‌تز
  • تماس با ما
  • درباره ما
ParsiTez - پارسی تز
  • صفحه اصلی
  • علوم انسانی
    • مدیریت
      • پایان نامه مدیریت اجرایی
      • پایان نامه مدیریت بازرگانی
      • پایان نامه مدیریت جهانگردی
      • پایان نامه مدیریت دولتی
    • اقتصاد
    • تربیت بدنی
    • حسابداری
    • حقوق
    • روانشناسی و مشاوره
    • زبان و ادبیات انگلیسی
    • زبان و ادبیات فارسی
    • علوم اجتماعی
    • علوم تربیتی
  • فنی و مهندسی
    • برق
    • صنایع
    • عمران
    • کامپیوتر
  • هنر
    • پژوهش هنر
    • شهرسازی
    • معماری
  • علوم پایه
    • پرستاری
  • گزارش کارآموزی
0

ورود و ثبت نام

پایان نامه: The Role of Using Creative Tasks in Improving Reading Comprehension Among EFL High School Learners

خانهپایان نامهپایان نامه زبان انگلیسیپایان نامه: The Role of Using Creative Tasks in Improving Reading Comprehension Among EFL High School Learners
در انتظار تصویر محصول

قیمت 106,800 تومان

افزودن به علاقه مندی ها
دانلود پیشنمایش
امتیاز
0 از 0 رأی
بدون امتیاز 0 رای
106,800 تومان
فرمت فایل word, pdf
  • توضیحات
  • فهرست مطالب
  • منابع

The Role of Using Creative Tasks in Improving Reading Comprehension Among EFL High School Learners

Abstract

Increasing learners’ performance in all skills especially in reading ability has always been the primary concern of language teachers. The present study examined the possible outcomes of the effectiveness of one type of TBLT’s task, creative tasks, on improving reading comprehension of EFL high school learners in Kerman. In total 70 male high school learners and 70 female high school learners in Kerman joined this study and after a homogenizing test was taken each gender of intermediate level was assigned to two homogenous groups of experimental and control consisted of 25 students. Data was collected in a Pretest and Posttest design. Pretest showed that control and experimental groups were not different regarding their reading comprehension. After using creative tasks as treatment in experimental groups, the statistical results demonstrated a significant difference between the pretest and posttest in that experimental group outperformed the control group in posttest reading comprehension test. Findings indicated that using creative tasks can effectively contribute to enhancing the ability of EFL high school learners in reading comprehension.

Key words:

Task, Creative Tasks, Reading Comprehension, EFL Learners.

فهرست مطالب

Chapter One: Preliminaries

1.1 Introduction. 2

1.2. Statement of the Problem.. 3

1.3. Significance of the Study. 3

1.4. Objectives of the Study. 4

1.5. Research Questions. 4

1.6. Research Hypotheses. 5

1.7. Theoretical Framework. 5

1.7.1. TBTL framework. 5

1.7.2. Creativity in Language Learning. 6

1.8. Limitations and Delimitations. 7

1.9. Definition of key Terms. 8

1.10. Conclusion. 8

Chapter Two : Review of Literature

2.1. Introduction. 10

2.2. Task- based language teaching. 10

2.3. TBLT in Action. 11

2.4. Definition of Task. 12

2.5. Task Components. 13

2.5.1. Goals. 13

2.5.2. Input 14

2.5.3. Activities. 14

2.5.4. Teacher’s and Learners’ Roles. 15

2.5.5. Settings. 16

2.6. Lesson Design. 16

2.7. Types of Task. 17

2.7.1. Willis’ classification. 17

2.7.2. Prabhu’s Classification. 18

2.7.3. Closed and Open Tasks. 18

2.8. Phases of the Task-based Framework. 19

2.8.1. The pre-task phase. 20

2.8.2. The During-Task Phase. 21

2.8.3. The Post-Task Phase. 21

2.9. Task-based Approach (TBA) VS Traditional Teaching Methods. 22

2.10. Approaches to Task-based language Teaching. 22

2.11. Characteristics of Task-based Language Teaching. 23

2.12. Task-based language teaching as a Powerful Approach for maximizing language learning and teaching. 23

2.13. Benefits and Challenges of Task-based Language Teaching. 24

2.14. Reading. 24

2.15. Reading Styles. 26

2.15.1. Intensive and Extensive Reading. 26

2.15.2. Scanning. 26

2.15.3. Skimming. 26

2.15.4. Search Reading. 27

2.15.5. Receptive reading. 27

2.15.6. Critical reading. 27

2.15.7. Reading for meaning. 28

2.15.8. Prediction. 28

  1. 15.9. Redundancy. 29

2.16. The Three Phases in a Reading Lesson. 29

2.16.1. Pre-Reading. 29

2.16.2. While-Reading. 30

2.16.3. Post–Reading. 31

2.17. Characteristics of Skilled Readers. 31

2.18. Models of RC.. 32

2.19. Factors Influencing RC outcomes. 33

2.19.1Cognitive factors. 33

2.19.2. Environmental Factors. 35

2.20. Individual Differences and RC Difficulties. 35

2.21. Different Reading Activities. 36

2.22. Characteristics of Active Reading Tasks. 36

2.23. The Application of TBT in Reading class. 37

2.23.1 Pre-task stage. 37

2.23.2. Task cycle. 38

2.23.2.1 Task. 38

2.23.2.2. Task designing. 39

2.23.2.3 Report stage. 40

2.23.3 Language focus. 40

2.24. Principles of TBLT.. 40

2.25. Creative Tasks in Reading Class: Communicative Tasks versus Creative Tasks. 41

2.26. Other Studies in this Field. 41

Chapter Three : Methodology

3.1. Introduction. 44

3.2. Subjects. 44

3.3 Instruments. 44

3.4. Design. 45

3.5. Data collection procedures. 46

3.6. Data analysis procedures. 46

3.7. Conclusion. 47

Chapter Four: Data presentation

4.1. Introduction. 49

4.2. Descriptive Statistics of Research Variables. 50

4.2.1. Normality Hypotheses. 50

4.3. Data Analysis Results. 52

4.3.1. What is the difference between male control group’s reading comprehension in pretest and posttest?. 52

4.3.2 What is the difference between male experimental group’s reading comprehension in pretest and posttest?. 52

4.3.3. What is the difference between control and experimental male group’s reading comprehension in posttest?. 53

4.3.4. What is the difference between female control group’s reading comprehension in pretest and posttest?. 53

4.3.5. What is the difference between female experimental group’s reading comprehension in pretest and posttest?. 54

4.3.6. What is the difference between control and experimental female group’s reading comprehension in posttest?. 54

4.4. Conclusion. 54

Chapter Five: Results and Implications

5.1. Introduction. 56

5.2. Summary of the Study. 56

5.3. Main Findings. 57

5.4. Examining Research Hypotheses. 58

5.5. Implication of the study. 58

5.6. Suggestions for Further Research. 59

5.7. Conclusion. 59

References. 61

Appendices. 69

List of Tables

Table                                                                                                                                    Page

2.1: A framework for designing task-based lessons. 16

2.2. A comparison of three approaches to TBLT.. 22

3.1: Frequency Distributions of subjects in male subjects. 44

3.2: Frequency Distributions of subjects in female subjects. 44

4.1: The normality of variables. 50

4-2: Group statistics of reading comprehension variable in pretest and posttest 50

4-3: Independent –sample T Test of reading comprehension scores in male control group  52

4-4: Independent –sample T Test of reading comprehension scores in male experimental group  52

4-5: Independent – sample T Test of reading comprehension in male control and experimental group in post test 53

4-6: Independent –sample T Test of reading comprehension scores in female control group  53

4-7: Independent –sample T Test of reading comprehension scores in female control group  54

4-8: Independent – sample T Test of reading comprehension in female control and experimental group in post test 54

List of Charts

Chart                                                                                                                                   Page

4-1: Comparison of reading ability in pretest and posttest of female group. 51

4-2: Comparison of reading ability in pretest and posttest of male group. 51

منابع

Adams, R. (2009), Recent publications on task-based language teaching: a review. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19, 339–355. doi:10.1111/j.1473-4192.2009.00239.x

Akyel, A., & Salatacı, R. (2002). Possible effects of strategy instruction on L1 and L2 reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 14(1), 1-17.

Allington, R. L., McGill-Franzen, A., Camilli, G., Williams, L., Graff, J., Zeig, J. & Nowak, R. (2010). Addressing summer reading setback among economically disadvantaged elementary students. Reading Psychology, 31(5), 411-427.

Barnes, D. (1976). From Communication to Curriculum. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

Been, S. (1979). Reading in the Foreign Language Program. Newbury House Publishers Inc.

Block, E. (1992). See how they read: comprehension monitoring of L1 and L2 readers. TESOL Quarterly, 26, 319–343.

Block, E., (1986). The comprehension strategies of second language readers. TESOL Quarterly, 20, 463–494.

Breen, M. (1987). 1. Learner contribution to task design. In C. Candlin and D. Murphy (eds.), Language Learning Tasks (pp.23-46). Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.

Breen, M. P. (1987). Contemporary paradigms in syllabus design, part I. Language Teaching, 20 (2), 81-91

Bygate, M., P. Skehan, and M. Swain. (2001). Researching pedagogic tasks: second language learning, teaching, and testing. Harlow: Pearson Education.

Candlin, C. N. (1987). Towards Task-Based Language Learning. In C. Candlin, & D. Murphy (Eds.), Language Learning Tasks (pp. 5-22). Lancaster Practical Papers in English. Lancaster: Lancaster University.

Candlin, C., & Murphy, D. (1987). Language learning tasks (Vol. 7). NJ: Prentice Hall.

Chall, J.S. (1996). Stages of reading development (2nd ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt-Brace.

Chastain, K. (1976). Developing Second Language skills Theory to Practice. Chicago: Rand McNally College Publishing Company.

Chastain, K. (1988). Developing Second-Language Skills: Theory and Practice (3rd ed.). USA: Harcourt Brace.

Clarke, M. A., Silberstein, S. (1977). Toward a Realization of Psycholinguistic Principles in The Esl Reading Class. Language Learning, 27: 135–154. doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1977.tb00297.x

Cohen, L., Manion, L. & Morrison, K. (1996). A Guide to Teaching Practice. London:Routledge.

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2001). Research methods in education (6th ed.). New York: Routledge

Crookes, G. and S. Gass. (eds). (1993a).Tasks and Language Learning: Integrating Theory and Practice. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

Crookes, G. and S. Gass. (eds.). (1993b). Tasks in a Pedagogical Context: Integrating Theory and Practice. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

Daniels, H., (2001). Vygotsky and Pedagogy. New York: Routledge Flamer

Davies, F. (1995). Introducing reading. UK: Penguin Books.

Demont, E. and Gombert, J.E. (1996). Phonological awareness as a predictor of decoding skills and syntactic awareness as a predictor of comprehension skills. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 315–332.

Dubin, F. (1982). What Every EFL Teacher Should Know about Reading. English Teaching Forum, XX(3), 14-16

Duke, N. K., & Pearson, P. (2002). Effective Practices for Developing Reading Comprehension. In Alan E. Farstrup & S. Jay Samuels (Eds.), What Research Has to Say About Reading Instruction (3rd ed., pp. 205-242). Newark, DE: International Reading Association, Inc.

Educational Testing service (2000-2001). TOEFL Test Preparation kit. Retrieved from http:..www.ets.org.Media.Test.TOEFL.PDF.989551.Pdf May 15, 2016.

Ellis, R. (1997a). Explicit knowledge and second language pedagogy. In L. Van Lier and D.Corson-(eds.). Encyclopedia of Language and Education Vol 6: Knowledge about Language. Dordrecht: KluwerAcademic.

Ellis, R. (1997b). The empirical evaluation of language teaching materials. ELT Journal, 51, 36-42.

Ellis, R. (2000). Task-based research and language pedagogy. Language teaching research, 4(3), 193-220.

Ellis, R. (2001). Focusing on form: Towards a research agenda. In W. Renandya and N. Sunga(eds). Language Curriculum and Instruction in Multicultural Societies pp. 123-144. Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Centre.

Ellis, R. (2001). Non-reciprocal tasks, comprehension and second language acquisition. In Researching Pedagogic Tasks. edited by Bygate M., Skehan P. & Swain M. London: Pearson Education Limited.

Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ellis, R. (2009). Task-based language teaching: sorting out the misunderstandings. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19(3), 221-246.

Ellis, R., H. Basturkmen and S. Loewen. (2001). Learner uptake in communicative ESL lessons. Language Learning, 51, 281-318.

Estaire, S., Zanon, J. (1994). Planning Classwork: A Task Based Approach. Oxford: Heinemann.

Foster, P., Skehan, P. (1996). The influence of planning and task type on second language performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 18: 299-323.

Foster, P., Skehan, P. (1999). The influence of planning and focus of planning on task-based performance. Language Teaching Research, 3, 215-247.

Friend, R. (2000). Teaching summarization as a content area strategy. Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 44(4), 320-329.

Gebhard, J. (1987). Successful Comprehension: What Teachers can do before Students Read. English Teaching forum, Vol. XXV, No. 02, pp. 24-25

Goodman, P. (1971). Compulsory miseducation. Harmonds worth: Penguin.

Grabe, W. (1991). Current developments in second language reading research. TESOL Quarterly, 25(3), 375-406.

Grabe, W. (2004). Research on teaching reading. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 44- 69.

Grabe, W., & Stroller, F. L. (2002). Teaching and researching reading. London: Pearson Education.

Grabe, W., Stoller, F. (1997). Reading and vocabulary development in a second language: A case study. Second language vocabulary acquisition, 5, 98-122.

Gray, K. (1990). Design for the General Class. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Grellet, F. (1981). Developing Reading Skills. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hatip, F. (2005). Task-based language learning. Available online at http:..www.yde.yildiz.edu.tr.uddo.belgeler.inca-FundaHatip-TBL.htm, accessed May 25, 2016.

Hoover, W. A., Gough, P. B. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing, 2, 127–160.

Jeon, I. & Hahn, J. (2006). Exploring EFL Teachers’ Perceptions of Task-Based Language Teaching: A Case Study of Korean Secondary School Classroom Practice. Asian EFL Journal, 8(1), 123-143.

Jetton, T. L., Alexander, P. A. (2001). Interest assessment and the content area literacy environment: Challenges for research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 13(3), 303-318.

Kashefian, S., Maarof, N. (2010). A study of the use of language learning strategies amongstudents in Iran. Malaysian Journal of ELT research, 6, 195-233.

Keyvanfar, A., Modaressi, M. (2009). The impact of task-based activities on the reading skill of Iranian EFL young learners at the beginner level. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2(1), 65-74.

Kintsch, W., & Rawson, K. A. (2005). Comprehension. In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 209–226). Malden, MA: Blackwell.

Klapper, J. (1996). Key English Test Handbook. Cambridge University: UCLES.

Klapper, J. (2003). Taking communication to task? A critical review of recent trends in language teaching. Language Learning Journal, 27, 33-42.

Kumaradivelu, B. (1993). The name of the task and the task of naming: Methodological aspects of task based pedagogy. Available at: http://works.bepress.com/b_kumaravadivelu/28/.

Kumaravadivelu, B. (1991). Language learning tasks: teacher intention and learner interpretation, ELT Journal, 45, 98-107.

LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S.J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293-323.

Lam, W. and J. Wong. (2000). The effects of strategy training on developing discussion skills in an ESLclassroom. ELT Journal 54, 245-55.

Larsen, F. D. (2000). Techniques and Principles in Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lin, Z. (2009). Task-based Approach in Foreign Language Teaching in China, A Seminar Paper Research Presented to the Graduate Faculty, University of Wisconsin-Platteville. Available online at http://minds.wisconsin.edu.bitstream.handle.1793.34571.zhu,%20Lin.pdf.txt?sequence=3 accessed July 10, 2016.

Long, M. (1985). A role for instruction in second language acquisition: task-based language teaching. In Hyltenstam, K., Pienemann, M. (eds.), Modeling and assessing second language acquisition. (pp. 77-79). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

Long, M. (1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In de Bot, K., Ginsberg, R., & Kramsch, C. (eds.). Foreign Language Research in Cross—Cultural Perspective, pp. 39-52. Amsterdam: John Benjamin.

Long, M. H. (1987). Native speaker, non-native speaker conversation in the second language classroom. In Long, H. M., Richards, C. J. (Eds.), Methodology in TESOL: A book for readings. New York: Newbury House Publishers.

Lono, L. P. (1987). Teaching Reading Skills: A Guide for the ESL Teacher. In C. Cargill (Ed.), TESOL Professional Anthology: Listening, Speaking, & Reading, pp. 67-80. USA: Volunted Publishers Inc.

Malmir A., Najafi S., Ghasemi A. (2011). The Effect of Task-Based Language Teaching (TBLT) vs. Content-Based Language Teaching (TBLT) on the Iranian Intermediate ESP Learners’ Reading Comprehension. The Iranian EFL Journal 7(6), 79-94.

Mao, Z. (2012). The application of task-based language teaching to English reading classroom. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(11), 24-30.

McCardle, P., Scarborough, H. S., Catts, H. W. (2001). Predicting, explaining, and preventing children’s reading difficulties. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 16(4), 230-239.

McDonough, S. H. (1995). Strategy and Skill in Learning a Foreign Language. London: Edward Arnold.

Nahavandi, N. (2011). The effect of task-based activities on EFL learners’ reading comprehension. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 2(1), 56-69.

Nation, K. (2005). Children’s Reading Comprehension Difficulties. Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Nation, K., & Snowling, M. (1997). Assessing reading difficulties: The validity and utility of current measures of reading skill. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 67(3), 359-370.

Nation, K., Cocksey, J., Taylor, J. S., & Bishop, D. V. (2010). A longitudinal investigation of early reading and language skills in children with poor reading comprehension. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 51(9), 1031-1039.

Nation, K., Snowling, M. J. (2000). Factors influencing syntactic awareness skills in normal readers and poor comprehenders. Applied psycholinguistics, 21(2), 229-241.

Numrich, C. (1996). On becoming a language teacher; Insights from diary studies. TESOL Quarterly, 30, 31-153.

Nunan, D. (1987). Communicative language teaching: Making it work. ELT Journal 41, 136-45.

Nunan, D. (1989a). Designing tasks for the communicative classroom. London: Cambridge University Press.

Nunan, D. (1989b). Understanding Language Classrooms: A Guide for Teacher-initiated Action.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nunan, D. (1991a). Communicative Tasks and the Language Curriculum, TESOL QUARTERLY, 15(2), 279-295.

Nunan, D. (1991b). Language Teaching Methodology: A Text Book for Teachers. New York: Prentice Hall International (UK) Ltd.

Nunan, D. (1999). Second Language Teaching and Learning. Boston: Thomson & Heinle.

Nunan, D. (2001a). Aspects of Task-Based Syllabus Design, Hong Kong. Retrieved from http://www.telus.net.linguistic issues syllabus design.html.

Nunan, D. (2001b). Designing tasks for the communicative classroom. Beijing: The People’s Education Press.

Nunan, D. (2004a). Practical English language teaching. Beijing: Higher Education Press.

Nunan, D. (2004b). Task-Based Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nutall, C. (1996). Teaching Reading Skills in a Foreign Language, London: Heinemann Educational Books Ltd.

Nuttall, C. (1982). Teaching reading skills in a foreign language. London: Heinemann Educational.

  1. B. Gough W. E. Tummer (1986) Decoding, reading and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 6–10.

Paris, S. G., Wasik, B. A., & Turner, J. C. (1991). The Development of Strategies of Readers. In R. Barr, M. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of Reading Research, 2, 609-640. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Paulston, C.B., Bruder, M. N. (1976). Teaching English as a Second Language: Techniques and Procedures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Pearson, P. D. Johnson, P. D. (1978). Teaching reading comprehension. New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston.

Platt, E., Brooks, F.B. (2002). Task Engagement: A Turning Point in Foreign Language Development. Language Learning, 52(2), 365-400.

Prabhu, N. S. (1987). Interactive Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Prabhu, N.S., (1987). Second Language Pedagogy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Pugh, A. K. (1978). Silent reading: An introduction to its study and teaching. London: Heineman.

Rashtchi, M. and Keyvanfar, A. (2007). ELT: Quick’n’easy(3rded.). Tehran: Rahnama.

Richards, J. (1996). Teachers’ maxims in language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 30, 281-296.

Richards, J. C. (1976). Teaching English for science and technology (Series 2). Singapore: Singapore University Press.

Richards, J. C., Platt, J., Weber, H. (1986). Longman Dictionary of Applied Linguistics London. Harlow, U.K.: Longman Addison-Wesley.

Richards, J. C., Renandya, W. A. (2002). Methodology in language teaching: Aanthology of current practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Richards, J.C., Nunan, D. (1990). Second Language Teacher Education. Cambridge: Cambridge UniversityPress.

Richards, J.C., Rodgers, S. (2001). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Rivers, W. M. (1981). Teaching Foreign Language Skills (2nd ed.). Chicago: The University of ChicagoPress.

Rose, D. (2006). Reading genre: a new wave of analysis. Linguistics and the human sciences, 2(2), 185.

Schon, D. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner. New York: Basic Books.

Sesma, H. W., Mahone, E. M., Levine, T., Eason, S. H., & Cutting, L. E. (2009). The contribution of executive skills to reading comprehension. Child Neuropsychology, 15(3), 232-246.

Skehan, P. (1996). A Framework for Implementation of Task-based Instruction, Applied Linguistics, 17(1), 38-59.

Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Skehan, P. (1998). Task-based instruction. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 18, 268-286. http://dx.doi.org.10.1017.S0267190500003585.

Skehan, P. (2001). Tasks and language performance assessment. In Bygate, M., Skehan, P., Soden M. (1994). Teaching Problem Solving in Vocational Education. New York: Routledge.

Skehan, P. and P. Foster. (1977). Task type and task processing conditions as influences on foreign language performance. Language Teaching Research 1, 185-211.

Smith, F. (1971). Understanding Reading: A Linguistic Analysis of Reading and Learning to Read. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Solan, H.A., Shelly-Tremblay, J.F., Hansen, P.C., Larson, S. (2007). Is there a common linkage among reading comprehension, visual attention, and magnocellular processing?. Journal of Learning Disabilities,S. 40(3), 270-278.

Storch, S. A., Whitehurst, G. J. (2002). Oral language and code-related precursors to reading: evidence from a longitudinal structural model. Developmental psychology, 38(6), 934.

Strauss, C., & Quinn, N. (1997). A cognitive theory of cultural meaning. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Swain. (eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, Teaching and testing,. Harlow: Longman.

Szymanski, M. H. (2003). Producing Text through Talk: Question-answering Activity in classroom peer groups, Linguistics and Education, 13(4), 533–563.

Tilfarlioglu, F. Y., & Basaran, S. (2007). Enhancing reading comprehension through task-based writing activities: An experimental study. The Reading Matrix, 7(3), 134-152.

Tomitch, L. M. B. (1991). Schema activation and text comprehension. Fragmentos (Florianópolis), Florianópolis-Sc, 3(2), 29-43

Tomitch, L. M. B. (1996). Individual differences in text organization perception and working memory capacity Revista da ANPOLL, 2, 71-93.

Tomitch, L. M. B. (2000). Designing reading tasks to foster critical thinking. Ilha do Desterro A Journal of English Language, Literatures in English and Cultural Studies, 38, 83-90.

Tomitch, L. M. B. (2000). Teaching main ideas: Are we really teaching? Linguagem & Ensino, 3(1), 45-53.

Tomitch, L. M. B. (in press b). Individual differences in working memory capacity and the recall of predicted elements in the text. Lenguas Modernas.

Tumolo, C. H. S. (1999). Vocabulary instruction: The text as a source in the classroom, Unpublished Master’s.

Urquhart, S., Cyril W. (1996). Reading in a Second Language Process, Product and Practice, 14(2), 214-217

Widdowson, H. G. (1978). Teaching Language as Communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Widdowson, H.G. (1979). Explorations in Applied Linguistics 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Wilkins, D. (1976). Notional syllabuses. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Williams, E. (1984). Reading in the Language Classroom. Printed in Hong Kong.

Willis, D., & Willis, J. (2001). Task-based Language Learning. In R. Carter & D. Nunan (Eds.). The Cambridge Guide to Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages, pp. 173-185). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Willis, J. (1996). A framework for task-based learning. Harlow: Longman.

Wixson, K. K., & Lipson, M. Y. (1991). Reading diagnosis and remediation. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresma.

Wren, S. (2000). The Cognitive Foundations of Learning To Read: A Framework. Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.

Yarahmadi, M. (2011). Gender differences views on problem-solving reading strategies in L2 acase study of Iranian EFL learners. Journal of basic and applied scientific research, 1(12), 2633-2634.

Yarmohammadi L. (2005) ESP in Iran from language planning perspective. Proceedings of the first National ESP. EAP conference. Tehran: SAMT Publications.

Yazar, U. (2013). Teaching reading to EFL students to make them better readers. Journal of Studies in Education, 3(3), 35-48.

Yuan, F., Ellis, R. (2003). The effects of pre-task planning and on-line planning on fluency, complexity and accuracy in monologist L2 oral production. Applied Linguistics, 24,127.

ZandMoghadam, A. (2007). The effect of task-based approach on the Iranian ESP learner reading comprehension (Dissertation).Tehran: Allameh Tabatabei University, [Persian].

برچسب: پارسی تز پایان نامه دانلود دبیری زبان انگلیسی

محصولات مشابه

پایان نامه طراحی مرکز اقامتی تفریحی آموزشی کودکان کار با رویکرد تعاملات اجتماعی

ysp
342,000 تومان
خرید محصول

پایان نامه طراحی گذر فرهنگی با محوریت تأکید بر خلق فضاهای فراملیتی در بافت قدیم و فرسوده شهر کرمان

ysp
342,000 تومان
خرید محصول

پایان نامه بررسی تاثیر تحریم های اقتصادی بر نابرابری درآمد در ایران

ysp
106,800 تومان
خرید محصول

قیمت 106,800 تومان

افزودن به علاقه مندی ها
دانلود پیشنمایش
امتیاز
0 از 0 رأی
بدون امتیاز 0 رای
106,800 تومان
فرمت فایل word, pdf
رشته دبیری زبان انگلیسی
تعداد صفحات 90
دسته: پایان نامه زبان انگلیسی، پایان نامه
https://parsitez.ir/?p=1727
درباره پارسی تز

رسالت پارسی تز ایجاد مرجعی قابل اتکا برای جویندگان دانش می‌باشد. در این راه سعی خواهیم نمود بهترین و بروزترین منابع آموزشی و کمک آموزشی را در اختیارتان قرار دهیم.

تماس با ما
  • 09332965932
  • info@parsitez.ir
دسترسی سریع
  • خانه
  • مجله پارسی‌تز
  • تماس با ما
  • درباره ما
نماد الکترونیکی

  • دانلود
  • پایان نامه
  • معماری
  • رساله معماری
  • پارسی تز
  • طراحی
  • کرمان
  • تربیت بدنی
  • هویت
  • معماری بومی
  • 100 واحدی
  • 12 کلاسه
  • 50 تختخوابی
  • 50 واحدی
  • 52 واحدی
  • 60 واحدی
  • biophilic
  • le corbusier
  • super imposition
  • آبدرمانی
  • آموزش
  • آموزشی
  • اﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﯽ
  • ادبیات
  • ادیب
  • ارتقاء امنیت محیطی
  • ارزش های پایدار
  • ارگانیک
  • استادیوم
  • استانداردسازي
  • استراحتگاه
  • اسلام
  • اسلامی
  • افزونه
  • اقامتی
  • اقتصاد
  • اقلیم
  • اقلیمی
  • اکسپو
  • الگوریتم چرخه آب
  • الگوریتم گرگ خاکستری
  • امید
  • اندیشه خلاق
  • انعطاف پذیری
  • انعطاف پذیری عملکردی
  • انگیزش پیشرفت
  • اوشناریوم
  • اوقات فراغت خانواده
  • ایران
  • ایرانی
  • ایستگاه قطار
  • بازآفرینی
  • بازار
  • بازار حاج اقا علی
  • بازار قلعه محمود
  • باززنده سازی
  • بازی
  • باغ ایرانی
  • باغ بهشت
  • بافت تاریخی
  • درباره ما
  • تماس با ما
ParsiTez - پارسی تز
  • آموزش
  • ارائه
  • پایان نامه
  • پایان نامه اقتصاد
  • پایان نامه برق
  • پایان نامه پرستاری
  • پایان نامه پژوهش هنر
  • پایان نامه تربیت بدنی
  • پایان نامه حسابداری
  • پایان نامه حقوق
  • پایان نامه روانشناسی و مشاوره
  • پایان نامه زبان انگلیسی
  • پایان نامه زبان و ادبیات فارسی
  • پایان نامه شهرسازی
  • پایان نامه صنایع
  • پایان نامه علوم اجتماعی و جامعه شناسی
  • پایان نامه علوم تربیتی
  • پایان نامه عمران
  • پایان نامه کامپیوتر
  • پایان نامه گرافیک
  • پایان نامه مدیریت
  • رساله معماری
  • پروپوزال
  • پروپوزال اقتصاد
  • پروپوزال پژوهش هنر
  • پروپوزال تربیت بدنی
  • پروپوزال حقوق
  • پروپوزال زبان و ادبیات انگلیسی
  • پروپوزال شهرسازی
  • پروپوزال علوم تربیتی
  • پروپوزال کامپیوتر
  • پروپوزال مدیریت
  • پروپوزال مشاوره و روانشناسی
  • پروپوزال معماری
  • ترجمه
  • کتاب
  • مقاله
  • سایر مقالات
  • مقاله مدیریت
  • مقاله معماری
  • مقاله هنر
طراحی شده توسط مدیاچی
تمامی حقوق این وب‌سایت برای پارسی‌تز محفوظ است 2022©
keyboard_arrow_up

تومان